Brown and Caldwell Home Page
Technical Papers RECENT PAPERS    ALL PAPERS      LOG IN

Brown and Caldwell engineers and scientists are technical and thought leaders in the environmental sector. Meet the people who have been advancing innovation for more than 70 years.
Author      Title/Abstract      

A Discussion of "Air or Oxygen Activated Sludge"
Author: Denny S. Parker
Date: 4/176
Presented at the 48th Annual Conference of the California Water Pollution Control Association, South Lake Tahoe, California, April 14-16, 1976

Stukenberg and McKinney have drawn an interesting comparison between air activated sludge and oxygen activated sludge systems.1 Their paper examines the "two prominently claimed benefits of oxygen…1) better effluent quality than obtained from conventionally aerated activated sludge systems, generally with a shorter detention time, and 2) less waste activated sludge than produced by a conventionally aerated system." The second claim is made repeatedly by manufacturers of the oxygen activated sludge systems and has often been contested in the technical literature. The first claim with its emphasis on effluent quality is not as widely stated by oxygen activated sludge advocates. True, manufacturers of oxygen activated sludge systems claim that smaller tanks can be used. However, the superiority of effluent quality is not as commonly claimed by oxygen advocates. In fact, a representative of the Union Carbide Corporation (UCC), the largest commercial supplier of oxygen systems, states that "we would not produce any worse or any better effluent quality than a well designed, well operated municipal air activated sludge system..."2 An identical statement has been made by a representative of UCC's leading competitor, Air Products and Chemicals.3 Thus, there seems to be at least a degree of agreement on the issue of effluent quality.